Context
Michelin aims to demonstrate the benefits of a tool for evaluating asset performance and simulating infrastructure asset management scenarios to optimize risk control, planning, and long-term asset management costs. Our client’s asset portfolio includes a 42-hectare industrial site, a 140,000 m² logistics site, and three tertiary buildings totaling 20,000 m².
Our solution
Data collection and asset modeling in Oxand Simeo by Oxand teams Adoption of Oxand Simeo by our client’s teams to assess the benefits, adjust the configuration, and prepare for deployment
What Oxand delivered
Right-sized asset maintenance
Ensure asset maintenance at the appropriate level in relation to expected service levels, associated risks, and regulatory requirements
Reduced management expenses
Reduce asset management expenses (by approximately 15% per year) and provide visibility at all technical and financial levels to prioritize operations
Questions about this reference
What did Michelin set out to demonstrate?
The benefit of a tool that evaluates asset performance and simulates asset management scenarios, so that risk control, planning and long-term asset management costs could be steered on the same base across industrial, logistics and tertiary sites.
What estate does the evaluation cover?
A 42-hectare industrial site, a 140,000 m² logistics site and three tertiary buildings totalling some 20,000 m².
How was the evaluation run?
Oxand teams collected the asset data and modelled the estate in Simeo. Michelin's own teams then worked in the tool to assess the benefit, adjust the configuration and prepare a wider deployment.
Why start with an evaluation rather than a full deployment?
Because the configuration that suits an industrial site is not obvious in advance. Running the evaluation on a representative perimeter is what lets the model be adjusted before it is extended, rather than corrected afterwards across the whole estate.
What does maintaining an asset at the right level mean?
It means matching maintenance to the service level expected of the asset, to the risk it carries and to the regulatory requirements that apply to it, rather than treating every asset on the same cycle.