Context
Troyes Champagne Métropole manages 61 buildings across 30 sites, in uses as varied as administrative, sporting and cultural. Its technical teams know the estate well, but the data they held was not fully put to work. The metropolitan authority set out to consolidate it, map the technical and energy condition of the buildings, and be able to argue its priorities against its capacity to invest.
Our solution
- 01 Collect and structure The estate data collected and structured across the whole portfolio.
- 02 Map the estate The technical and energy condition of the buildings mapped on one reference.
- 03 Compare three strategies Three maintenance strategies built as scenarios and compared inside multi-year investment plans ordered by risk.
- 04 Justify the priorities Investment needs identified and the order of works argued.
What Oxand delivered
A solution at the scale of the estate
A solution that deploys across a large and heterogeneous portfolio of buildings.
Indicators that challenge
Indicators to arbitrate needs, and to challenge the strategic and budget directions in place.
Works plans put on evidence
The works programme made objective, and the procurement to launch readable from it.
Questions about this reference
What estate does the authority manage?
61 buildings across 30 sites, in varied uses: administrative, sporting and cultural.
What does comparing three strategies change?
A single strategy is hard to discuss: you take it or refuse it. Three costed trajectories side by side turn the budget conversation into an argued choice, with the price of each thing given up made visible.
Does the plan cover energy as well?
Yes: the mapping covers the technical and the energy condition of the buildings on the same reference, so both enter the same trade-off.
What links the plan to public procurement?
The plan says which works fall when; that is what makes it possible to identify the right procurement to launch, and to group it rather than let it follow the emergencies.